Welcome! » Log In » Create A New Profile
Top Users

Jay-Z v. Nas revisited

Posted by BM31 
Registered: 14 years ago
Posts: 1,418
Status: Moderator
avatar Re: Jay-Z v. Nas revisited
November 19, 2012 09:27PM
^^well put, Beatmaster - good point.


I say it is an element...that's why rchecka and I (with the endorsement and feedback of others) added it to our periodic table - which can be viewed via the homepage.





peace.
Registered: 13 years ago
Posts: 349
Status: Street Knowledge
avatar Re: Jay-Z v. Nas revisited
November 19, 2012 09:37PM
I give my full vote for it as an element,
if you look at the whole body of Hip Hop.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/19/2012 09:39PM by BM31.
Registered: 13 years ago
Posts: 57
Status: Student
Re: Jay-Z v. Nas revisited
November 21, 2012 07:43PM
Quote
BM31
Quote
Truseone
Although I wouldnt call it an element,

I feel you true,although
I'd like to get down with a little convo on this one fam.
Is it or is it not an element?

I remember MC battles as far back as 1978,
of course Herc started with Coke 5 years earlier, so I know in some hood somewhere
brothers and sisters had to be battlin'.
In saying this...
if BEEF has been around almost as long as it's inception
why wouldn't it be an element?
Because isn't it among the atoms and molecules that make up the total body of Hip Hop?
I don't know what do yall think?

Here's my take on this fam. Yes the beef has always been a part of the culture, but I see it more as a by-product, as opposed to anything definitive, to which the culture's existence rests on. Yes I understand, there was definitely cats battling back in those days. Did these battles bring about competition to make dudes sharp? Yes. But how about in today's context? See the reason the Nas and Jay thing went the way it did, was because these two brothers came up in the golden era. Beef now has a far different connotation in today's hip hop landscape. Rappers now would rather pull out the ratchet than think of a dope verse to respond to a diss.



[www.facebook.com]
Registered: 13 years ago
Posts: 349
Status: Street Knowledge
avatar Re: Jay-Z v. Nas revisited
November 22, 2012 06:40AM
Quote
Truseone
Here's my take on this fam. Yes the beef has always been a part of the culture, but I see it more as a by-product, as opposed to anything definitive, to which the culture's existence rests on.

Ok, I think I feel you on this, do you feel it's just more of semantics..case in point say
the purpose of some (sneakers/kicks) is to protect your feet while your walking,
but whether or not they have shoelaces it does not really affect the mission of the pair of kicks itself,feel me.Like a baller with a earring or tattoo,it might look cool but he can still put up 20 and 10
a night without it on the court.I'm using these analogies to understand what your saying,fam.
I'm diggin that you feel it is there but Hip Hop
didn't really need it to survive.Right or wrong?

I was looking at the aspect of Hip Hop as it's entire entity.Like a state.
States have cities, towns,streets,parks,schools,etc.
Many things make up a State.So even though Atlantic Avenue,
is smaller in retrospect to the entire borough of Brooklyn.
It still is apart of Brooklyn (and Queens also) thus forth it makes up NYC,
which is one of the cities that make up the state of New York.

So I feel that Elements sort to say, are all things in regards to Hip Hop,
because as you know atoms and molecules could be large and small depending on
what structure it makes up.Only my opinion.

Peace to ya fam.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/23/2012 07:02AM by BM31.
Registered: 13 years ago
Posts: 57
Status: Student
Re: Jay-Z v. Nas revisited
November 22, 2012 11:02PM
Quote
BM31
Quote
Truseone
Here's my take on this fam. Yes the beef has always been a part of the culture, but I see it more as a by-product, as opposed to anything definitive, to which the culture's existence rests on.

Ok, I think I feel you on this, do you feel it's just more of semantics..case in point say
the purpose of some (sneakers/kicks) is to protect your feet while your walking,but whether or not they have shoelaces
it does not really affect the mission of the pair of kicks itself,feel me.
like a baller with a earring or tattoo,it might look cool but he can still put up 20 and 10 a night without it on the court.
i'm using these analogies to understand what your saying,fam.I'm diggin that you feel it is there but Hip Hop
didn't really need it to survive.Right or wrong?



Hahahaha loving the analogies g . Yeah that's about the size of it. I completely understand where you're coming from. Speaking of the B-Ball analogy..Basketball will always be basketball. The rivalries between teams like the Pistons and Bulls made it more entertaining.



[www.facebook.com]
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login